Market Loss Assistance Program in Barnes County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,283
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $27,683,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Wallace Legge | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $76,558 |
82 | Bruce Duane Anderson | Valley City, ND 58072 | $75,874 |
83 | Jeffrey Allen Wurzer | Fingal, ND 58031 | $75,736 |
84 | Rodney Kim Latt | Litchville, ND 58461 | $75,543 |
85 | Myron Clauson | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $75,310 |
86 | Melvin Anthony Wendel | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $75,252 |
87 | Gilbertson Farms Inc | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $75,222 |
88 | Lee Rose | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $75,143 |
89 | Perry James Burchill | Luverne, ND 58056 | $75,055 |
90 | Todd Gerald Wendel | Valley City, ND 58072 | $74,995 |
91 | James Olaf Broten | Dazey, ND 58429 | $74,448 |
92 | Louis Nicoli | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $73,731 |
93 | Darrell Holm | Valley City, ND 58072 | $73,370 |
94 | Michael Andrew Skogen | Valley City, ND 58072 | $73,296 |
95 | Gage Grain Farm Ltd | Oriska, ND 58063 | $72,566 |
96 | Kevin Lee Harstad | Rogers, ND 58479 | $72,426 |
97 | Peter Alan Richman | Valley City, ND 58072 | $71,374 |
98 | Albrecht Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $71,045 |
99 | Ronald Noecker | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $70,842 |
100 | Robert K Larson | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $70,374 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”