Farm Subsidy information
Barnes County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Barnes County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 3,254
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $990,987,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Robert Donald Klein Jr | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $1,114,697 |
122 | James Anthony Slag | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $1,100,177 |
123 | Burchill Family Farms | Page, ND 58064 | $1,097,305 |
124 | Jeffrey Dean Buchholz | Fingal, ND 58031 | $1,097,038 |
125 | Rood Farms | Valley City, ND 58072 | $1,090,670 |
126 | Neal Scott Dimmer | Fingal, ND 58031 | $1,086,271 |
127 | Kurt Michael Reidman | Dazey, ND 58429 | $1,085,756 |
128 | John G Dimmer | Oriska, ND 58063 | $1,075,191 |
129 | Daniel Joseph Elston | Rogers, ND 58479 | $1,074,328 |
130 | Gilbertson Farms Inc | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $1,062,743 |
131 | Brian Kiefert | Valley City, ND 58072 | $1,059,899 |
132 | Brady Duane Jorissen | Rogers, ND 58479 | $1,054,981 |
133 | John Ottilius Anderson Jr | Oriska, ND 58063 | $1,052,199 |
134 | Rodney Kluvers | Litchville, ND 58461 | $1,042,411 |
135 | Duane T Burchill Jr | Page, ND 58064 | $1,038,194 |
136 | Henry Wade Bruns | Oriska, ND 58063 | $1,037,769 |
137 | James & Patricia Broten Jv | Dazey, ND 58429 | $1,022,312 |
138 | Thomas Johnson | Marion, ND 58466 | $1,022,288 |
139 | Kyle Myron Petersen | Dazey, ND 58429 | $1,020,584 |
140 | Markus Phillip Mueller | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $1,020,219 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”