Loan Deficiency in Barnes County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,216
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $51,297,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Wallace Legge | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $122,614 |
122 | Duane Sortland | Valley City, ND 58072 | $122,565 |
123 | Mark William Thomsen | Valley City, ND 58072 | $121,320 |
124 | Lawrence A Formo | Litchville, ND 58461 | $119,672 |
125 | John Ottilius Anderson Jr | Oriska, ND 58063 | $119,404 |
126 | Benjamin Lee Elder | Dazey, ND 58429 | $118,213 |
127 | G & D Baasch Partnership | Oriska, ND 58063 | $118,148 |
128 | Mark Gordon Svenningsen | Luverne, ND 58056 | $117,746 |
129 | Hal Klinger | Valley City, ND 58072 | $116,065 |
130 | Darrel Melvin Bjornson | Valley City, ND 58072 | $114,994 |
131 | Rodd Steven Svenningsen | Luverne, ND 58056 | $114,894 |
132 | Dan Undem | Rogers, ND 58479 | $114,843 |
133 | Clemens Farms Inc | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $114,802 |
134 | Perry James Burchill | Luverne, ND 58056 | $114,129 |
135 | Kenneth Clauson | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $113,998 |
136 | Wesley Ten Pas | Litchville, ND 58461 | $113,644 |
137 | Larry Undem | Rogers, ND 58479 | $113,481 |
138 | Gregory Gene Smith | Marion, ND 58466 | $112,582 |
139 | Joel E Mcclean | Ypsilanti, ND 58497 | $112,476 |
140 | Kevin Jay Roorda | Marion, ND 58466 | $111,903 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”