Total Commodity Programs in Barnes County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 2,374
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $365,617,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Colin Harold Conley | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $606,592 |
182 | Jeffrey Allen Wurzer | Fingal, ND 58031 | $602,728 |
183 | Daniel Joseph Elston | Rogers, ND 58479 | $601,578 |
184 | Leslie Manstrom | Valley City, ND 58072 | $597,661 |
185 | Duane Sortland | Valley City, ND 58072 | $593,155 |
186 | David Joseph Lettenmaier | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $592,733 |
187 | Louis Nicoli | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $587,314 |
188 | John W Stevens | Valley City, ND 58072 | $586,142 |
189 | Melvin Anthony Wendel | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $581,274 |
190 | Arnold Roorda | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $580,881 |
191 | Douglas Duane Lettenmaier | Litchville, ND 58461 | $578,396 |
192 | Wallace Legge | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $575,459 |
193 | Thomas Undem | Rogers, ND 58479 | $573,090 |
194 | Nickolai Lawrence Holm | Valley City, ND 58072 | $571,343 |
195 | Robert K Larson | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $570,303 |
196 | Matt & Courtney Jorissen Jv | Valley City, ND 58072 | $569,556 |
197 | Thomas Langemo | Valley City, ND 58072 | $565,992 |
198 | Keith Leistikow | Fargo, ND 58104 | $565,946 |
199 | Kevin Becker | Dazey, ND 58429 | $565,419 |
200 | Anthony Thilmony | Valley City, ND 58072 | $562,561 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”