Farm Subsidy information
Barnes County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Barnes County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,254
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $990,987,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mcmillan Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $8,867,775 |
2 | Winter Farms Family Ptnr | Oriska, ND 58063 | $8,684,111 |
3 | Kohler Farms Partnership | Valley City, ND 58072 | $8,305,657 |
4 | Noeske Farms | Valley City, ND 58072 | $5,922,278 |
5 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $5,271,265 |
6 | A & M Farms | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $4,564,885 |
7 | Anderson Brothers | Rogers, ND 58479 | $4,500,108 |
8 | Chad Wendel | Valley City, ND 58072 | $3,395,438 |
9 | Enger Grain & Livestock | Marion, ND 58466 | $3,379,078 |
10 | Nelson Farms | Litchville, ND 58461 | $3,287,522 |
11 | Albrecht Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $3,020,185 |
12 | Lee Guscette Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $2,908,323 |
13 | Larson Farms Jtvt | Tower City, ND 58071 | $2,900,055 |
14 | Wurzer Farms | Fingal, ND 58031 | $2,881,843 |
15 | Burchill Farms | Luverne, ND 58056 | $2,669,025 |
16 | Gullickson Farms | Spiritwood, ND 58481 | $2,652,255 |
17 | R & D Rose Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $2,603,893 |
18 | Guscette Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $2,555,444 |
19 | Mp Farms | Valley City, ND 58072 | $2,488,580 |
20 | Jason Robert Klein | Spiritwood, ND 58481 | $2,455,467 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>