Market Loss Assistance Program in Benson County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 928
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Benson County, North Dakota totaled $18,701,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John Herman Kallenbach | Esmond, ND 58332 | $88,845 |
42 | Keith Alan Smith | Maddock, ND 58348 | $88,812 |
43 | Reuben & Clarice Liechty Farms | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $88,062 |
44 | Dean Louis Johnson | Oberon, ND 58357 | $87,845 |
45 | Lynn Arnold | Esmond, ND 58332 | $87,194 |
46 | Richard A Kurtz Jr | Saint Michael, ND 58370 | $86,883 |
47 | Randy Scott Buckmier | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $86,007 |
48 | Dean Johnson | Leeds, ND 58346 | $85,843 |
49 | Dennis Kurtz | Saint Michael, ND 58370 | $84,007 |
50 | David Burton Holje | Maddock, ND 58348 | $83,882 |
51 | Tarang Farms | Leeds, ND 58346 | $83,542 |
52 | Philip A Backstrom | Maddock, ND 58348 | $82,588 |
53 | G & L Farms Inc | York, ND 58386 | $80,988 |
54 | James D Arnold | Esmond, ND 58332 | $80,793 |
55 | Lorin Lee Haagenson | Leeds, ND 58346 | $80,088 |
56 | Rodger Benson | Fargo, ND 58104 | $79,846 |
57 | Duane Anderson | Leeds, ND 58346 | $79,541 |
58 | Brian James Engstrom | Leeds, ND 58346 | $79,525 |
59 | James Brian Engstrom | Leeds, ND 58346 | $79,524 |
60 | Timothy Morris Kallenbach | Maddock, ND 58348 | $79,284 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”