Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Benson County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 389
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Benson County, North Dakota totaled $17,447,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Lorin Lee Haagenson | Leeds, ND 58346 | $55,029 |
122 | Tyler Karlsbraaten | Harvey, ND 58341 | $54,975 |
123 | Brian Andrew Kraft | Saint Michael, ND 58370 | $52,973 |
124 | Nick Walter | Warwick, ND 58381 | $52,880 |
125 | Darrell Conrad Walter | Warwick, ND 58381 | $52,820 |
126 | Douglas E Wentz | Esmond, ND 58332 | $52,621 |
127 | Randy Lee Silliman | York, ND 58386 | $52,022 |
128 | Keith Hanson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $51,184 |
129 | Jason Hanson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $51,184 |
130 | Timothy Dean Stone | Knox, ND 58343 | $50,461 |
131 | Tufte Farms Inc | York, ND 58386 | $50,394 |
132 | Kevin Paul Gigstad | Maddock, ND 58348 | $50,141 |
133 | Justin Green | Maddock, ND 58348 | $50,009 |
134 | Ben Tufte | Leeds, ND 58346 | $49,994 |
135 | Randall Simon | Oberon, ND 58357 | $49,938 |
136 | Michael Jon Hakanson | Maddock, ND 58348 | $49,895 |
137 | Dennis Johnson | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $49,558 |
138 | Jaden Kallenbach | Maddock, ND 58348 | $49,198 |
139 | Mark Ludvig Hoffert | Rugby, ND 58368 | $49,161 |
140 | Eric Karlsbraaten | Esmond, ND 58332 | $49,139 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”