Farm Subsidy information
Benson County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Benson County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,272
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Benson County, North Dakota totaled $657,067,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ronald Kramer | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,310,533 |
62 | David Wolfe | Esmond, ND 58332 | $1,302,934 |
63 | Duane Stadum | Esmond, ND 58332 | $1,301,105 |
64 | Lynn Arnold | Esmond, ND 58332 | $1,294,539 |
65 | Eric Kent Jorgenson | Leeds, ND 58346 | $1,286,890 |
66 | Douglas James Schmid | Oberon, ND 58357 | $1,285,113 |
67 | Robert John Buckmier | Maddock, ND 58348 | $1,268,813 |
68 | Richard Olson | Maddock, ND 58348 | $1,253,579 |
69 | Dean Johnson | Leeds, ND 58346 | $1,246,315 |
70 | Robert Louis Arnold | Minot, ND 58701 | $1,234,953 |
71 | Gannon Larson | Leeds, ND 58346 | $1,233,198 |
72 | Randy Scott Buckmier | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $1,229,976 |
73 | Jarvis Harlan Hegland | Oberon, ND 58357 | $1,208,678 |
74 | Randall Simon | Oberon, ND 58357 | $1,206,038 |
75 | Timothy Joe Tuchscherer | York, ND 58386 | $1,201,737 |
76 | Gary Olof Sears | Minnewaukan, ND 58351 | $1,187,675 |
77 | Kory C Jorgenson | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,177,463 |
78 | Gerald Joseph Eberle | York, ND 58386 | $1,155,230 |
79 | Randy Benson | Maddock, ND 58348 | $1,150,002 |
80 | Robert Buckmier Farms Inc | Maddock, ND 58348 | $1,149,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”