Conservation Reserve Program in Bottineau County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 1,716
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Bottineau County, North Dakota totaled $82,105,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Terrance Cecil Backman | Souris, ND 58783 | $111,263 |
202 | Raymond Zurcher Estate | Upham, ND 58789 | $109,325 |
203 | Bruce Condit | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $109,290 |
204 | Mabel Brandvold | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $109,282 |
205 | Rodney Allen Kersten | Kramer, ND 58748 | $109,150 |
206 | Sharla Colebank | Lafayette, LA 70507 | $108,243 |
207 | Paul Dauphinais | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $108,229 |
208 | James Edward Miller | Newburg, ND 58762 | $108,137 |
209 | Harvey Demars | Westhope, ND 58793 | $106,997 |
210 | Cheryl Mammenga | Titusville, FL 32780 | $106,771 |
211 | Shirley Bullinger | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $106,634 |
212 | Clarence Carlson | Maxbass, ND 58760 | $106,449 |
213 | Donald Geiszler | Morris, MN 56267 | $106,181 |
214 | Arvid Anderson | Harper, KS 67058 | $105,935 |
215 | Nola Biberdorf | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $104,611 |
216 | David O'connell | Lansford, ND 58750 | $104,477 |
217 | Ardell Cossette | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $104,328 |
218 | David Hall | Newburg, ND 58762 | $103,447 |
219 | Mark Leroy Bernstein | Souris, ND 58783 | $103,210 |
220 | Norman Glinz | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $102,926 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”