Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Bottineau County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 188
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Bottineau County, North Dakota totaled $1,147,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Duane Ommedal | Maxbass, ND 58760 | $4,956 |
62 | Daryl Pritschet | Willow City, ND 58384 | $4,919 |
63 | James Bowers | Janesville, MN 56048 | $4,903 |
64 | Austin N Mastvelton | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $4,903 |
65 | Scott Monson | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $4,748 |
66 | Clay Erdman | Souris, ND 58783 | $4,568 |
67 | Lynn Harlan Asheim | Mohall, ND 58761 | $4,383 |
68 | Douglas Demontigny | Dunseith, ND 58329 | $4,379 |
69 | Phillip E Brekke | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $4,253 |
70 | Myron Roen | Willow City, ND 58384 | $4,217 |
71 | Matthew David Hunter | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $4,199 |
72 | Anjuli Ratilal Undlin | Lansford, ND 58750 | $4,193 |
73 | Ronald L Monson | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $4,118 |
74 | Michael Biberdorf | Rolette, ND 58366 | $4,041 |
75 | Matthew Roland | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $4,010 |
76 | Craig Strong | Dunseith, ND 58329 | $3,956 |
77 | Mark Demontigny | Dunseith, ND 58329 | $3,907 |
78 | Steven Alan Nickelson | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $3,872 |
79 | Patrick Cunningham | Lansford, ND 58750 | $3,816 |
80 | Dustin Monson | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $3,794 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”