Total Commodity Programs in Bottineau County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 767
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Bottineau County, North Dakota totaled $20,369,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas Leroy Hall | Newburg, ND 58762 | $78,380 |
82 | Farmop Capital, LLC ** | St Paul, MN 55101 | $76,232 |
83 | Dnd Partnership | Westhope, ND 58793 | $76,123 |
84 | Katie Faith Kersten-tyler | Lansford, ND 58750 | $76,093 |
85 | Stuart Rothe | Westhope, ND 58793 | $76,061 |
86 | Lyle B Lesmann | Souris, ND 58783 | $75,403 |
87 | Karson Allen Schepp | Kramer, ND 58748 | $74,149 |
88 | Kevin Floyd Tyler | Lansford, ND 58750 | $74,065 |
89 | Carol Faye Debele | Kramer, ND 58748 | $72,718 |
90 | Dylan Stratton | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $72,332 |
91 | Scott Thomas Smith | Willow City, ND 58384 | $71,774 |
92 | Gabriel Sofus Thompson Jr | Antler, ND 58711 | $71,198 |
93 | Jay Michael Bullinger | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $71,105 |
94 | Jackie Lynn Bullinger | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $71,105 |
95 | Shane Edward Feland | Antler, ND 58711 | $70,765 |
96 | Paxton Lee Engelhard | Souris, ND 58783 | $69,689 |
97 | Plainview Farm Inc | Newburg, ND 58762 | $69,556 |
98 | Clinton Patrick Patterson | Minot, ND 58703 | $68,836 |
99 | Rachel Rae Patterson | Minot, ND 58703 | $68,836 |
100 | Brian Joseph Nordmark | Souris, ND 58783 | $68,711 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”