Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Bowman County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 274
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Bowman County, North Dakota totaled $11,938,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kelly Schumacher | Reeder, ND 58649 | $102,183 |
42 | Randy Lee Brown | Scranton, ND 58653 | $101,603 |
43 | Robert Earl Brewer | Bowman, ND 58623 | $101,105 |
44 | Arrow F Ranch LLC | Ludlow, SD 57755 | $100,988 |
45 | Lance Johnson | Bowman, ND 58623 | $97,553 |
46 | Roger Lowell Ruggles | Scranton, ND 58653 | $97,328 |
47 | Ernest Leo Schober | Bowman, ND 58623 | $96,826 |
48 | Cletus Edward Miller | Scranton, ND 58653 | $96,184 |
49 | Apryl L Pierce | Scranton, ND 58653 | $95,598 |
50 | Monte Leland Freitag | Scranton, ND 58653 | $92,133 |
51 | Rita Jean Freitag | Scranton, ND 58653 | $92,133 |
52 | Neal D Freitag | Scranton, ND 58653 | $90,556 |
53 | Justin Freitag | Scranton, ND 58653 | $90,502 |
54 | Lorna Lambourn | Scranton, ND 58653 | $82,794 |
55 | Myles W Richard | Bowman, ND 58623 | $80,790 |
56 | Kelly R Turbiville | Rhame, ND 58651 | $79,112 |
57 | William E Norton | Scranton, ND 58653 | $77,195 |
58 | Robert Joe Osendorf | Bowman, ND 58623 | $76,740 |
59 | Hudson Pierce | Scranton, ND 58653 | $76,044 |
60 | James Winston Turbiville | Rhame, ND 58651 | $74,916 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”