Loan Deficiency in Bowman County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 480
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Bowman County, North Dakota totaled $11,568,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gene H Ensign | Scranton, ND 58653 | $27,173 |
82 | Bunny Elizabeth Buckman | Scranton, ND 58653 | $25,273 |
83 | Raymond Kromarek | Scranton, ND 58653 | $24,918 |
84 | Dale Freymiller | Scranton, ND 58653 | $24,552 |
85 | James Winston Turbiville | Rhame, ND 58651 | $24,466 |
86 | Grace & Donald Voss Surface Trust | Bowman, ND 58623 | $23,809 |
87 | Lane Arlan Dingfelder | Bowman, ND 58623 | $23,775 |
88 | Vernon Larry Pierce | Scranton, ND 58653 | $23,271 |
89 | Jerome Anthony Fischer | Rhame, ND 58651 | $22,960 |
90 | Sherman Oakland | Rhame, ND 58651 | $22,907 |
91 | Ralph Dorothy Pierce Real Est Tru | Scranton, ND 58653 | $22,692 |
92 | Scott Hansen | Bowman, ND 58623 | $22,160 |
93 | Joseph William Griffin | Scranton, ND 58653 | $22,155 |
94 | Gerald Freitag Estate | Morehouse, MO 63868 | $22,085 |
95 | Gloria Deutscher | Reeder, ND 58649 | $21,670 |
96 | Douglas A Abrahamson | Bowman, ND 58623 | $21,630 |
97 | Jerome Douglas Caron | Scranton, ND 58653 | $21,612 |
98 | Steven Benjamin Reimer | Bowman, ND 58623 | $21,561 |
99 | Kenneth Abrahamson | Medora, ND 58645 | $21,496 |
100 | Charles Hilton | Bowman, ND 58623 | $21,345 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”