Total Conservation Programs in Bowman County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 886
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Bowman County, North Dakota totaled $44,826,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Shirley Richards Estate | Saint Petersburg, FL 33702 | $115,829 |
102 | Rodney Schaaf | Bowman, ND 58623 | $115,175 |
103 | Evelyn Miller | Rhame, ND 58651 | $114,469 |
104 | Cold Turkey Farm | Bowman, ND 58623 | $114,041 |
105 | Freitag Survivor's Trust | Tucson, AZ 85739 | $113,156 |
106 | Brian Layton Kempenich | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $113,111 |
107 | Larry Cevin Torpen | Bowman, ND 58623 | $112,714 |
108 | Beverly L Kasper Family Trust | Brookings, SD 57006 | $111,319 |
109 | Frank Fish | Rhame, ND 58651 | $111,150 |
110 | Paul White | Bowman, ND 58623 | $110,760 |
111 | Bill Freitag | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $107,957 |
112 | Charles Keller | Scranton, ND 58653 | $107,941 |
113 | Jeff O Hansen | Bonner Springs, KS 66012 | $107,116 |
114 | Thorvald Rolfsness | Bowman, ND 58623 | $104,934 |
115 | Dale Marburger | Bowman, ND 58623 | $102,082 |
116 | Beth Mollman | Black Hawk, SD 57718 | $101,815 |
117 | Cleo Ballweber | Bowman, ND 58623 | $101,076 |
118 | Ina Holmquist | Rhame, ND 58651 | $100,986 |
119 | Dennis Swanke | Bowman, ND 58623 | $100,413 |
120 | Roger Lowell Ruggles | Scranton, ND 58653 | $99,324 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”