Loan Deficiency in Bowman County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 480
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Bowman County, North Dakota totaled $11,568,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Evelyn Allram | Bowman, ND 58623 | $15,874 |
122 | Vernon Peterson | Gascoyne, ND 58653 | $15,558 |
123 | Roger Getz | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $15,551 |
124 | Bobby L Olsen | Bowman, ND 58623 | $15,315 |
125 | Wes Miller | Rhame, ND 58651 | $15,211 |
126 | Kevin Mckitrick | Bowman, ND 58623 | $15,084 |
127 | Boyd Mckitrick | Bowman, ND 58623 | $15,084 |
128 | Leo Heinrich | Bowman, ND 58623 | $14,795 |
129 | Walter Boxeth | Bowman, ND 58623 | $14,570 |
130 | Dale Marburger | Bowman, ND 58623 | $14,529 |
131 | Kenneth Silha | Bowman, ND 58623 | $14,350 |
132 | Gary Symanowski | Scranton, ND 58653 | $13,928 |
133 | George M Reiger | Scranton, ND 58653 | $13,811 |
134 | Darrell Lutes | Bowman, ND 58623 | $13,714 |
135 | David Bliss | Scranton, ND 58653 | $13,311 |
136 | Lisa Marie Nunez | Camp Verde, AZ 86322 | $13,234 |
137 | Barbara Ann Maychrzak | Scranton, ND 58653 | $13,209 |
138 | Harrison Kerr | Bowman, ND 58623 | $13,087 |
139 | Margaret Boyce | Rhame, ND 58651 | $13,066 |
140 | Joseph B Mckitrick | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $12,580 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”