Farm Subsidy information
Burke County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Burke County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 519
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Burke County, North Dakota totaled $25,215,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | James Mathias Funk | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $250,000 |
2 | Laury Hennix | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $234,952 |
3 | Melin Grain Farm Llp | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $226,988 |
4 | Denton Frederick Overton | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $162,775 |
5 | Grady D Bakken | Lignite, ND 58752 | $150,438 |
6 | Stephen Patrik Miller | Flaxton, ND 58737 | $135,104 |
7 | Judd Walker Thorlaksen | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $111,266 |
8 | Bryce Lane Hennix | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $101,370 |
9 | Bryan Foster Ankenbauer | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $101,289 |
10 | Adam Jerome Jensen | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $99,037 |
11 | Phillip James Hamilton | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $90,819 |
12 | Patrick Schoemer | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $86,444 |
13 | Justin Lee Iverson | Columbus, ND 58727 | $86,236 |
14 | Perry Leroy Ackerman | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $84,356 |
15 | Michael Steven Ely | Columbus, ND 58727 | $82,690 |
16 | Kyle James Nygaard | Flaxton, ND 58737 | $81,023 |
17 | Brian Thomas Rystedt | Battleview, ND 58773 | $79,966 |
18 | Patrick Michael Ely | Columbus, ND 58727 | $75,699 |
19 | Marshall Wade Hermanson | Stanley, ND 58784 | $74,570 |
20 | Daniel Wade Peterson | Columbus, ND 58727 | $73,221 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>