Farm Subsidy information
Burke County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Burke County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 691
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Burke County, North Dakota totaled $30,889,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daniel Wade Peterson | Columbus, ND 58727 | $104,728 |
62 | Richard Earl Weinmann | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $104,306 |
63 | Hunter M Rodin | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $101,365 |
64 | Jacob L Rodin | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $101,286 |
65 | Barry Dean Nelson | Flaxton, ND 58737 | $98,411 |
66 | Bruce Forrest Ankenbauer | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $98,091 |
67 | John R Aufforth | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $97,422 |
68 | James Bohl | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $95,551 |
69 | Jacobson Farms Inc | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $94,318 |
70 | Melvin Lee Titus | Battleview, ND 58773 | $92,442 |
71 | Jim Van Berkom, LLC | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $90,353 |
72 | Joseph Mertes | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $89,315 |
73 | Jeremy Bullinger | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $89,215 |
74 | Lenny Rodin | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $89,134 |
75 | Roelf Aufforth | Bagley, MN 56621 | $89,119 |
76 | Kyle James Nygaard | Flaxton, ND 58737 | $89,020 |
77 | Timothy John Lucy | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $88,657 |
78 | Tim Hegstad | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $88,368 |
79 | State Bank & Trust/kenmare ** | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $86,728 |
80 | Mark Barenthsen | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $86,296 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”