Market Loss Assistance Program in Burke County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,213
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Burke County, North Dakota totaled $11,551,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jerome Koppelsloen | Minot, ND 58701 | $38,622 |
82 | Marlin Peterson | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $38,171 |
83 | Robert Neuenfeld | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $37,601 |
84 | Dale Maury Ganskop | Flaxton, ND 58737 | $37,182 |
85 | Richard Thane Bonsness | Columbus, ND 58727 | $36,755 |
86 | John Duane Aufforth | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $36,679 |
87 | Dean Durick | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $36,650 |
88 | Terry Lee Wolkenhauer | Flaxton, ND 58737 | $35,096 |
89 | Kenneth Lavern Radenz | Eagan, MN 55122 | $35,029 |
90 | David Melvin Rystedt | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $34,682 |
91 | Norman Olson | Wilton, ND 58579 | $34,632 |
92 | Richard Earl Weinmann | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $34,226 |
93 | Hal Ross | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $34,019 |
94 | L E Anthony Bly | Lignite, ND 58752 | $33,979 |
95 | Thomas Alexander Rystedt | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $33,704 |
96 | Douglas Macarthur Bonsness | Rolla, ND 58367 | $33,551 |
97 | Shawn Bly | Lignite, ND 58752 | $33,478 |
98 | Donald Winzenburg | Lignite, ND 58752 | $33,170 |
99 | Wendell Swenson | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $33,041 |
100 | C E Butgereit | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $32,731 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”