Total Conservation Programs in Burke County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 333
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Burke County, North Dakota totaled $1,129,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Steven John Overlee | Mcgregor, ND 58755 | $2,136 |
142 | Diane E Weaver | Ankeny, IA 50023 | $2,129 |
143 | Arlin Gunderson | Enumclaw, WA 98022 | $2,118 |
144 | Roseland Nd Trust Dated April 15, 2019 | Watertown, SD 57201 | $2,114 |
145 | Leroy Johnson | Minot, ND 58701 | $2,059 |
146 | Keith Mogren | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $2,031 |
147 | Amanda Oas | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $2,029 |
148 | Fay L H Mcphail | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $2,019 |
149 | Lois Eckert | Minot, ND 58703 | $2,003 |
150 | Mike Anderson | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $1,996 |
151 | Howard Lawrence Anderson | Minot, ND 58701 | $1,996 |
152 | Mandy Giem | Williston, ND 58801 | $1,984 |
153 | Donna Kulstad | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $1,967 |
154 | Denise Birkeland | Williston, ND 58801 | $1,956 |
155 | Darlene Larson | San Antonio, TX 78260 | $1,956 |
156 | Darrol Durward | Trenton, ND 58853 | $1,956 |
157 | Delmar Durward | Minot, ND 58701 | $1,956 |
158 | Sharon E Spaedy | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $1,929 |
159 | Leon Doyle Maloski | Alhambra, CA 91803 | $1,925 |
160 | Della Erickson | Minot, ND 58701 | $1,919 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”