Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Burleigh County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 358
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Burleigh County, North Dakota totaled $611,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gary Maher | Menoken, ND 58558 | $18,991 |
2 | Dewitz Feedlot Inc | Steele, ND 58482 | $15,215 |
3 | Whitman Cattle Co | Driscoll, ND 58532 | $12,609 |
4 | Gerald P Schmidt | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $11,531 |
5 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,907 |
6 | Barry J Becker | Baldwin, ND 58521 | $9,738 |
7 | Vollmer Angus Ranch Inc | Wing, ND 58494 | $9,316 |
8 | Allan F Glatt | Linton, ND 58552 | $9,064 |
9 | D J Coleman Inc | Baldwin, ND 58521 | $7,553 |
10 | Mcpeak Partnership | Driscoll, ND 58532 | $7,466 |
11 | Ellingson Ranch Inc | St Anthony, ND 58566 | $7,286 |
12 | Randall Ray Ryberg | Menoken, ND 58558 | $7,217 |
13 | James Randal Hornbacher | Menoken, ND 58558 | $6,842 |
14 | Jerry Doan | Mckenzie, ND 58572 | $6,253 |
15 | Dustin L Leno | Wing, ND 58494 | $5,921 |
16 | James M Schmidt | Menoken, ND 58558 | $5,570 |
17 | Will Macdonald | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $5,085 |
18 | Paul L Andahl | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $4,950 |
19 | Kip Rath | Sterling, ND 58572 | $4,447 |
20 | Sean Russell Agnew | Menoken, ND 58558 | $4,401 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>