Farm Subsidy information
Cass County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Cass County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 868
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cass County, North Dakota totaled $80,035,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Charlotte Marie Pueppke | Amenia, ND 58004 | $122,691 |
102 | Todd Patrick Zaun | Buffalo, ND 58011 | $120,712 |
103 | Jeffrey Ronald Beilke | Buffalo, ND 58011 | $120,193 |
104 | Brian Lorenz Buhr | Buffalo, ND 58011 | $119,547 |
105 | Brent Arnold Buhr | Casselton, ND 58012 | $119,547 |
106 | Robyn Leigh Buhr | Buffalo, ND 58011 | $119,547 |
107 | Angela Kay Buhr | Casselton, ND 58012 | $119,547 |
108 | Kenneth S. Christl | Mapleton, ND 58059 | $118,284 |
109 | Kevin Heiden | Gardner, ND 58036 | $114,531 |
110 | Tyler Zimmerman | Leonard, ND 58052 | $113,161 |
111 | Todd Ellison | Mapleton, ND 58059 | $112,608 |
112 | Keith Robert Johnson | Arthur, ND 58006 | $112,234 |
113 | Bradley Evan Beilke | Buffalo, ND 58011 | $111,811 |
114 | D & K Larsen Farms Inc | Harwood, ND 58042 | $111,373 |
115 | Bradley Utke | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $110,723 |
116 | David William Martin | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $110,047 |
117 | Steven D Johnson Farms Inc | Fargo, ND 58103 | $108,863 |
118 | James And Jennifer Thompson | Page, ND 58064 | $108,634 |
119 | Clinton James Pueppke | Ayr, ND 58007 | $107,540 |
120 | Eric Lyle Pueppke | Amenia, ND 58004 | $106,688 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”