Total Conservation Programs in Cass County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 358
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cass County, North Dakota totaled $1,591,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Nicholas Vinje | Hunter, ND 58048 | $3,086 |
142 | Audrey-audrey E Roach Rev Living Trust Roach | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $3,068 |
143 | Shelby J Lien | Fargo, ND 58104 | $3,067 |
144 | Lloyd Prischmann | Fargo, ND 58102 | $3,052 |
145 | Mark Thompson | Mandan, ND 58554 | $2,952 |
146 | Darrell Malone | Davenport, ND 58021 | $2,894 |
147 | Robert Rock | Fargo, ND 58107 | $2,879 |
148 | Karen E Roach | Casselton, ND 58012 | $2,876 |
149 | Sara Stringfellow | Fargo, ND 58107 | $2,838 |
150 | Susan Melsi | Fargo, ND 58107 | $2,838 |
151 | Kyle Edward Olstad | Tower City, ND 58071 | $2,773 |
152 | Mark Weber Rev Living Trust | Casselton, ND 58012 | $2,757 |
153 | Karen L Urlacher's Separate Trust | Moorhead, MN 56560 | $2,649 |
154 | Buhr Erickson Farm Partnership | Buffalo, ND 58011 | $2,625 |
155 | Lyle Marcus Andvik | Kindred, ND 58051 | $2,620 |
156 | Rodney Nelson | Amenia, ND 58004 | $2,618 |
157 | Dennis Chester Meier | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $2,577 |
158 | Brian Michael Rieck | Durbin, ND 58059 | $2,513 |
159 | Verrill Sprunk | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $2,506 |
160 | William E Bartholomaus | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $2,478 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”