Farm Subsidy information
Cass County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Cass County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,074
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cass County, North Dakota totaled $71,275,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cass Clay Farms 15 | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $1,026,379 |
2 | Morlock Honey Farms LLC | Casselton, ND 58012 | $557,822 |
3 | Harvest Partners | Durbin, ND 58059 | $480,519 |
4 | Dalrymple Farms | Casselton, ND 58012 | $468,864 |
5 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $445,777 |
6 | Kyle Edward Olstad | Tower City, ND 58071 | $390,925 |
7 | Banknorth ** | Arthur, ND 58006 | $378,791 |
8 | Saewert Brothers Partnership | Davenport, ND 58021 | $359,951 |
9 | Red Valley Acres | Blanchard, ND 58009 | $353,095 |
10 | Dallas Clifford Glasow | Davenport, ND 58021 | $336,356 |
11 | M And M Farms Partnership | Tower City, ND 58071 | $323,046 |
12 | Plains Commerce Bank | Hoven, SD 57450 | $312,219 |
13 | Derek Scott Flaten | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $305,005 |
14 | Kasowski Grain Farm | Buffalo, ND 58011 | $300,000 |
15 | Todd Weber Farms | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $289,140 |
16 | Jr Farms Inc | Tower City, ND 58071 | $276,906 |
17 | Paula Joan Glasow | Davenport, ND 58021 | $256,107 |
18 | Radermacher Farms | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $249,036 |
19 | Thompson Family Farm Jtvt | Page, ND 58064 | $241,934 |
20 | A & A Farms | Page, ND 58064 | $238,918 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>