Counter Cyclical Program in Cass County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,055
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cass County, North Dakota totaled $6,367,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | B & T Farms Jt Vt | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $41,192 |
22 | John Randall Jackson | Leonard, ND 58052 | $40,902 |
23 | Mitchell Farms Inc | Erie, ND 58029 | $40,719 |
24 | Mark Lewis Ottis | Kindred, ND 58051 | $40,135 |
25 | Joan Edna Ottis | Kindred, ND 58051 | $40,135 |
26 | Brett Meyers | Galesburg, ND 58035 | $39,391 |
27 | Kellerman Brothers Farms | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $39,009 |
28 | Ulmer Farms Part | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $38,712 |
29 | William Robert Wedberg Jr | Hunter, ND 58048 | $37,878 |
30 | Clayton Andrew Brown | Leonard, ND 58052 | $37,806 |
31 | William Lemna | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $37,495 |
32 | Terrence Lynn Nelson | Page, ND 58064 | $37,275 |
33 | Arnold James Buhr | Buffalo, ND 58011 | $36,826 |
34 | Luther Farms Jtvt | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $35,916 |
35 | A & A Farms | Page, ND 58064 | $35,688 |
36 | Dows Farm Company Inc | Erie, ND 58029 | $35,486 |
37 | Zaun Farm Inc | Buffalo, ND 58011 | $35,050 |
38 | Highland Farms Partnership | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $35,000 |
39 | Glasow Farms Partnership | Davenport, ND 58021 | $34,805 |
40 | Robin James Mitchell | Galesburg, ND 58035 | $34,070 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”