Counter Cyclical Program in Cavalier County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 905
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cavalier County, North Dakota totaled $2,165,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul George Balsdon | Osnabrock, ND 58269 | $10,144 |
22 | Gary Lyn Badding | Hannah, ND 58239 | $9,734 |
23 | James Edward Spanier | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,687 |
24 | Keith Wayne Gunn | Hannah, ND 58239 | $9,682 |
25 | William Roy | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,580 |
26 | Rodney Dean Haraseth | Nekoma, ND 58355 | $9,421 |
27 | Richard M Borgen | Hannah, ND 58239 | $9,335 |
28 | Hilary William Petri Family Trust | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,328 |
29 | Paul Edward Peterson | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,194 |
30 | Stephen Paul Schefter | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,182 |
31 | William Glenn Wenzel | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,121 |
32 | Larry Lynn Treleaven | Rugby, ND 58368 | $9,022 |
33 | Gary Allen Haraseth | Langdon, ND 58249 | $8,929 |
34 | Lawrence Michael Gellner | Langdon, ND 58249 | $8,831 |
35 | Terrell John Henderson | Calvin, ND 58323 | $8,683 |
36 | Delwyn Eugene Gage | Sarles, ND 58372 | $8,662 |
37 | David Allen Lundeby | Osnabrock, ND 58269 | $8,516 |
38 | Steven Aaron Lundeby | Osnabrock, ND 58269 | $8,516 |
39 | Van Curtis Howatt | Langdon, ND 58249 | $8,441 |
40 | Thomas Lee Balsdon | Osnabrock, ND 58269 | $8,366 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”