Market Gains in Cavalier County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 535
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Cavalier County, North Dakota totaled $4,575,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Leland George Balsdon | Osnabrock, ND 58269 | $20,077 |
62 | Dennis Wayne Borgen | Langdon, ND 58249 | $20,059 |
63 | Marvin Dick | Munich, ND 58352 | $19,745 |
64 | Dennis Lou Morris | Linton, ND 58552 | $19,578 |
65 | Justin Michael Roppel | Hampden, ND 58338 | $19,286 |
66 | Leslie Joseph Stremick | Langdon, ND 58249 | $18,761 |
67 | Bruce David Severson | Hampden, ND 58338 | $18,015 |
68 | Kenneth Ray Borho | Langdon, ND 58249 | $17,976 |
69 | Joel David Jacobson | Langdon, ND 58249 | $17,756 |
70 | Charles Lawrence Schiestel | Wales, ND 58281 | $17,662 |
71 | Barbara Jean Schiestel | Wales, ND 58281 | $17,662 |
72 | David Jon Hart | Langdon, ND 58249 | $17,604 |
73 | William Neil Power | Wilton, ND 58579 | $17,599 |
74 | Dale James Bernardy | Munich, ND 58352 | $17,432 |
75 | David Carl Monson | Osnabrock, ND 58269 | $17,261 |
76 | Roland Gail Hodgins | Sarles, ND 58372 | $16,854 |
77 | Michael Henry Dick | Munich, ND 58352 | $16,434 |
78 | Owen Nicholas Goeser | Munich, ND 58352 | $16,382 |
79 | Elizabeth Jane Goeser | Munich, ND 58352 | $16,382 |
80 | Richard Joseph Zimmer | Munich, ND 58352 | $15,933 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”