Market Gains in Cavalier County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 535
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Cavalier County, North Dakota totaled $4,575,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Darrel Frank Kempert | Wales, ND 58281 | $12,985 |
102 | Jonathan Gary Wirth | Munich, ND 58352 | $12,955 |
103 | Troy Palmer Olson | Langdon, ND 58249 | $12,841 |
104 | Rodney Allen Hoffman | Munich, ND 58352 | $12,827 |
105 | Delwyn Dewain Hoffman | Munich, ND 58352 | $12,751 |
106 | Patrick Earl Ryan | Hannah, ND 58239 | $12,393 |
107 | Gregory Paul Eisenzimmer | Munich, ND 58352 | $12,366 |
108 | Geryl Douglas Harder | Starkweather, ND 58377 | $12,305 |
109 | Barry Ross Schafer | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $12,236 |
110 | Douglas Lundeby | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $12,206 |
111 | Richard Allyn Romfo | Hannah, ND 58239 | $12,150 |
112 | Lillian Balsdon Estate | Osnabrock, ND 58269 | $12,044 |
113 | Randy Earl Evans | Langdon, ND 58249 | $12,036 |
114 | Jeffrey Lyle Overby | Langdon, ND 58249 | $11,948 |
115 | Rebecca Kay Overby | Langdon, ND 58249 | $11,948 |
116 | Gregory Haider | Munich, ND 58352 | $11,871 |
117 | Andrew Lee Haider | Munich, ND 58352 | $11,871 |
118 | Quentin Lee Ames | Langdon, ND 58249 | $11,866 |
119 | Elmer J Scott | Hannah, ND 58239 | $11,750 |
120 | Floyd R Boesl | Langdon, ND 58249 | $11,693 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”