Market Loss Assistance Program in Cavalier County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,096
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Cavalier County, North Dakota totaled $37,411,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mark Loren Kakela | Langdon, ND 58249 | $90,844 |
102 | Jon Alan Iverson | Langdon, ND 58249 | $90,663 |
103 | Steven Matthew Kakela | Langdon, ND 58249 | $90,588 |
104 | Jonasson Farms | Milton, ND 58260 | $89,938 |
105 | Robert Louis Becker | Langdon, ND 58249 | $89,823 |
106 | Ronald Gerard Hoffarth | Langdon, ND 58249 | $89,706 |
107 | William Roy | Langdon, ND 58249 | $89,268 |
108 | Kenneth Vernon Weaver | Munich, ND 58352 | $88,980 |
109 | Robert Wesley Ullyott | Langdon, ND 58249 | $88,732 |
110 | Thomas Albert Schill | Langdon, ND 58249 | $87,756 |
111 | Paul Edward Boesl | Langdon, ND 58249 | $87,350 |
112 | Thomas Dale Hall | Munich, ND 58352 | $86,459 |
113 | Kevin James Bata | Langdon, ND 58249 | $86,388 |
114 | Lawrence Weber | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $86,137 |
115 | Patsy A Weber | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $86,137 |
116 | Marlene Kay Petri | Langdon, ND 58249 | $86,125 |
117 | Douglas Dean Plummer | Hannah, ND 58239 | $85,948 |
118 | Larry Elden Ohma | Hampden, ND 58338 | $85,734 |
119 | Randy James Hultstrand | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $85,408 |
120 | Dennis Odel Berg | Langdon, ND 58249 | $85,240 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”