Conservation Reserve Program in Dickey County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 271
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Dickey County, North Dakota totaled $2,866,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kaiser Ranch Inc | Monango, ND 58436 | $19,453 |
42 | Virginia Widmer | Oakes, ND 58474 | $19,140 |
43 | Darrel Dean Werre | Monango, ND 58436 | $19,075 |
44 | Edwin Klatt | Strasburg, ND 58573 | $18,838 |
45 | Edward Schiefelbein | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $18,708 |
46 | Louise Mills Werre | Monango, ND 58436 | $18,587 |
47 | Michael Eugene German | Fullerton, ND 58441 | $18,388 |
48 | The James M And Georgia M Deering Family Limited | Fullerton, ND 58441 | $18,334 |
49 | Larry Andersen | Oakes, ND 58474 | $18,135 |
50 | Kelly Kenneth Glynn | Fullerton, ND 58441 | $17,607 |
51 | Larry Hansen | Oakes, ND 58474 | $17,458 |
52 | Paul Hansen | Oakes, ND 58474 | $17,376 |
53 | Werre Family Farm Limited Partnership 2 | Monango, ND 58436 | $17,011 |
54 | Nancy L Johnson | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $16,682 |
55 | Hei Mitchell | Lake View Terrace, CA 91342 | $16,462 |
56 | Dennis Duane Werre | Saint George, UT 84770 | $16,384 |
57 | Kay Irene Werre | Saint George, UT 84770 | $16,384 |
58 | Lawrence J Thorpe Lllp | Oakes, ND 58474 | $16,308 |
59 | Wayne Wiek | Oakes, ND 58474 | $16,096 |
60 | Marilyn Wiek | Oakes, ND 58474 | $16,096 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”