Farm Subsidy information
Eddy County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Eddy County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 396
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Eddy County, North Dakota totaled $15,424,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Travis Gilbert Black | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $63,233 |
42 | Todd Martin Koepplin | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $61,903 |
43 | Michael Kjelgaard | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $60,866 |
44 | Benjamin Aaron Walter | Warwick, ND 58381 | $60,140 |
45 | Timothy John Allmaras | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $59,282 |
46 | Bobby Hoyt | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $58,606 |
47 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $57,086 |
48 | Brandon James Ziebart | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $56,347 |
49 | Mark Edward Seastrand | Minot, ND 58703 | $56,234 |
50 | Kenmar Bison Ranch Llp | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $56,163 |
51 | Peter Larson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $55,614 |
52 | John Dennis Allmaras | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $55,032 |
53 | Bryan Hilbert | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $54,986 |
54 | Danny Carlson | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $54,719 |
55 | Lucas Walter | Warwick, ND 58381 | $52,820 |
56 | David Lee Fleming | Warwick, ND 58381 | $51,643 |
57 | Jacob Robert Engels | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $51,054 |
58 | Jeffrey Alan Engels | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $51,054 |
59 | Phyllis B & Jay Topp | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $50,813 |
60 | Joshua James Ziebart | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $50,442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”