Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Eddy County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 93
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Eddy County, North Dakota totaled $3,049,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Marvel Ebenhahn | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $8,596 |
62 | Daniel Shroyer | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $8,488 |
63 | James Allen Cleveland | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $7,631 |
64 | Gayle Evelyn Cleveland | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $7,631 |
65 | Jeff Erman | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $7,328 |
66 | Mary Erman | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $7,328 |
67 | James/marlys Ferguson Living Trus | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $6,682 |
68 | Glenn Cudworth | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $6,232 |
69 | Merry K Turner | Fargo, ND 58107 | $5,488 |
70 | Levi Weber | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $5,408 |
71 | Loren John Anderson | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $4,943 |
72 | Gavin Chester Black | Grace City, ND 58445 | $4,082 |
73 | Seth Jerome Lura | Carrington, ND 58421 | $3,837 |
74 | Michael E Williams | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $2,549 |
75 | Richard Harding | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $2,548 |
76 | Norris Rud | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $2,492 |
77 | Casey Weber | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $1,998 |
78 | Edwin R Whetham | Wilton, ND 58579 | $1,995 |
79 | Stephen Matthew Guler | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $1,515 |
80 | C I D Farm | Carrington, ND 58421 | $1,488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”