Farm Subsidy information
Eddy County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Eddy County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 396
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Eddy County, North Dakota totaled $15,425,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T-t Ranch | Grace City, ND 58445 | $567,640 |
| 2 | Bank Forward ** | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $403,162 |
| 3 | Levi Weber | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $278,081 |
| 4 | Casey Weber | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $263,711 |
| 5 | Schaefer Farms | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $221,331 |
| 6 | Daniel Olaf Birkeland | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $218,380 |
| 7 | Thompson Apiaries Inc | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $180,844 |
| 8 | Gordon Allan Benson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $165,355 |
| 9 | Messner Farms | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $126,467 |
| 10 | James Edward Langley | Warwick, ND 58381 | $116,688 |
| 11 | Vicky Richter | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $112,727 |
| 12 | Kenneth Allen Reis | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $109,172 |
| 13 | Neil C Backman | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $98,514 |
| 14 | Gregory Chester Rue | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $98,101 |
| 15 | Travis Lee Benson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $94,060 |
| 16 | James Allmaras | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $93,877 |
| 17 | Stuart Richter | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $92,254 |
| 18 | David Gerard Steinbach | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $86,660 |
| 19 | Hultgren Farms | Warwick, ND 58381 | $86,058 |
| 20 | Soderholm Farm Acct | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $85,062 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf