Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Eddy County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 203
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Eddy County, North Dakota totaled $14,132,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kent Osborne Myhre | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $171,207 |
22 | Bruce Kjelgaard | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $169,106 |
23 | Phyllis B & Jay Topp | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $161,756 |
24 | Tim Indergaard | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $158,114 |
25 | Neil C Backman | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $151,912 |
26 | Grant Alan Tweed | Tolna, ND 58380 | $150,498 |
27 | Soderholm Farm Acct | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $142,843 |
28 | Todd Martin Koepplin | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $137,568 |
29 | Bryce Benson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $132,011 |
30 | Peter Larson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $131,731 |
31 | Danny James Harding | Tolna, ND 58380 | $131,241 |
32 | Darin Weber | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $127,918 |
33 | Dennis Weber | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $127,918 |
34 | Roger Eugene Benson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $126,072 |
35 | James Edward Langley | Warwick, ND 58381 | $120,536 |
36 | Brandon James Ziebart | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $120,104 |
37 | Sven Carlson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $119,333 |
38 | Albert Lawrence Pfeiffer | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $119,201 |
39 | Randy James Guler | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $113,312 |
40 | Colleen Faye Benson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $112,407 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”