Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Eddy County, North Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 196
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Eddy County, North Dakota totaled $9,994,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bryce Benson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $112,574 |
22 | Danny James Harding | Tolna, ND 58380 | $110,854 |
23 | Travis Lee Benson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $107,332 |
24 | Roger Eugene Benson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $107,177 |
25 | Brandon James Ziebart | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $99,968 |
26 | Albert Lawrence Pfeiffer | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $98,294 |
27 | Sven Carlson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $98,120 |
28 | Bryan Hilbert | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $97,621 |
29 | Randy James Guler | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $97,404 |
30 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $97,160 |
31 | Colleen Faye Benson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $96,920 |
32 | Hultgren Farms | Warwick, ND 58381 | $90,200 |
33 | Gary Duane Hilbert | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $89,500 |
34 | Kenneth Allen Reis | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $87,254 |
35 | Mark Edward Seastrand | Minot, ND 58703 | $85,205 |
36 | Kent Osborne Myhre | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $81,493 |
37 | Danny Carlson | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $76,765 |
38 | Stephen Matthew Guler | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $76,374 |
39 | Travis Gilbert Black | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $75,111 |
40 | John Dennis Allmaras | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $74,917 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”