Total Commodity Programs in Eddy County, North Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 262
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Eddy County, North Dakota totaled $12,335,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Timothy John Allmaras | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $86,663 |
42 | Mark Edward Seastrand | Minot, ND 58703 | $85,205 |
43 | James A Cleveland | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $84,500 |
44 | David B Cleveland | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $84,500 |
45 | Jay Leroy Hendrickson | Carrington, ND 58421 | $83,405 |
46 | John Dennis Allmaras | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $81,262 |
47 | Grant Alan Tweed | Tolna, ND 58380 | $80,374 |
48 | Preston Byron Langley | Warwick, ND 58381 | $77,886 |
49 | Leslie Alan Hoyt | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $77,824 |
50 | Johnny Carlson | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $77,392 |
51 | Stephen Matthew Guler | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $76,374 |
52 | Travis Gilbert Black | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $75,111 |
53 | Peter Larson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $72,361 |
54 | Jacob Robert Engels | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $69,373 |
55 | Jeffrey Alan Engels | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $69,373 |
56 | David Gerard Steinbach | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $66,933 |
57 | Todd Martin Koepplin | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $66,109 |
58 | Gene Langley | Warwick, ND 58381 | $62,300 |
59 | Larry Peterson | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $62,211 |
60 | Joshua James Ziebart | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $60,286 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”