Counter Cyclical Program in Emmons County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 600
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Emmons County, North Dakota totaled $1,532,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Glenn Thomas Mccrory | Linton, ND 58552 | $13,938 |
22 | Bruce Doolittle | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $13,399 |
23 | Brian Christopher Leier | Linton, ND 58552 | $12,797 |
24 | Thomas Allen Voller | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $12,481 |
25 | Kent Graham | Mandan, ND 58554 | $12,130 |
26 | Kenneth Dale Nieuwsma | Strasburg, ND 58573 | $11,985 |
27 | Larry Todd Rodenburg | Hague, ND 58542 | $10,885 |
28 | Patrick William Humann | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $10,798 |
29 | Augustin Eugene Tschosik | Strasburg, ND 58573 | $10,567 |
30 | Darrel Don Sehn | Linton, ND 58552 | $10,403 |
31 | Michael John Appert | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $10,275 |
32 | Thomas Leo Schaefbauer | Strasburg, ND 58573 | $10,026 |
33 | Monte Lane Vander Vorst | Pollock, SD 57648 | $9,786 |
34 | Willis Vander Wal | Pollock, SD 57648 | $9,748 |
35 | Mark Naaden | Braddock, ND 58524 | $9,215 |
36 | Daniel Joseph Materi | Strasburg, ND 58573 | $9,199 |
37 | Dewayne Scherr | Moffit, ND 58560 | $9,081 |
38 | John Russell Beck | Linton, ND 58552 | $8,879 |
39 | Kevin Bernhardt | Linton, ND 58552 | $8,455 |
40 | Scott Arnold Baumiller | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $8,285 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”