Farm Subsidy information
Emmons County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Emmons County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,404
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Emmons County, North Dakota totaled $602,745,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mark Scott Reamann | Braddock, ND 58524 | $724,910 |
102 | Jerry Humann | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $716,058 |
103 | Calvin Kelsch | Linton, ND 58552 | $714,524 |
104 | James Strand | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $705,254 |
105 | Ernie J Roehrich | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $703,384 |
106 | Ryan Paul Nagel | Linton, ND 58552 | $703,035 |
107 | Rainbow Acres, Inc. | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $700,138 |
108 | Dean Joseph Schell | Linton, ND 58552 | $698,706 |
109 | Justin Jon Engelhart | Zeeland, ND 58581 | $698,532 |
110 | Tony D Goldade | Hague, ND 58542 | $697,462 |
111 | Harvey Mattern | Strasburg, ND 58573 | $695,993 |
112 | Jerome Grossman | Linton, ND 58552 | $694,743 |
113 | Will Brothers | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $691,853 |
114 | Larry Jangula | Linton, ND 58552 | $689,189 |
115 | Monte Lane Vander Vorst | Pollock, SD 57648 | $687,725 |
116 | David Wolbaum | Braddock, ND 58524 | $686,205 |
117 | John Frank Mccrory | Linton, ND 58552 | $685,835 |
118 | Corene Jean Purintun | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $685,267 |
119 | Gerard Schwab | Strasburg, ND 58573 | $684,981 |
120 | Kenneth A Grossman | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $682,609 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”