Conservation Reserve Program in Emmons County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,070
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Emmons County, North Dakota totaled $44,398,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Grace A E Streyle | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $114,707 |
102 | William H Kneeshaw | Littlefork, MN 56653 | $113,854 |
103 | Steve J Grenz | Cheyenne, WY 82009 | $112,948 |
104 | Douglas F Balliet | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $112,209 |
105 | Connie L Gleason | Wichita, KS 67212 | $112,071 |
106 | Knapp Revocable Living Trust The | Oro Valley, AZ 85755 | $111,458 |
107 | Ronald Ryckman | Linton, ND 58552 | $110,510 |
108 | Viola Schumacher | Linton, ND 58552 | $110,485 |
109 | Max A Mosset | Linton, ND 58552 | $110,277 |
110 | Volk Revoc 1992 Trust Ray J | Linton, ND 58552 | $108,391 |
111 | Temvik Land Partnership L L P | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $107,562 |
112 | Gerrit Nieuwsma | Hague, ND 58542 | $107,516 |
113 | Herman Mosset | Linton, ND 58552 | $106,837 |
114 | Allan Mastel | Bismarck, ND 58502 | $106,661 |
115 | Donald Nilssen Estate | Kintyre, ND 58549 | $106,264 |
116 | Harley K Grenz | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $106,238 |
117 | Ken Silvernagel | Billings, MT 59105 | $106,184 |
118 | Leo Masset | Linton, ND 58552 | $103,837 |
119 | Wayne Moser | Piedmont, SD 57769 | $103,128 |
120 | Rodenburg-mcculley Family Living | Peoria, AZ 85382 | $102,596 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”