Market Gains in Emmons County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 158
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Emmons County, North Dakota totaled $1,020,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John Russell Beck | Linton, ND 58552 | $14,030 |
22 | Allen Leo Wald | Hague, ND 58542 | $12,653 |
23 | Claude Frank Saville | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $12,170 |
24 | Terrance Senger | Wishek, ND 58495 | $10,407 |
25 | Thomas Allen Voller | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $9,826 |
26 | Jerry Van Beek | Hague, ND 58542 | $9,613 |
27 | John Allen Schmidt | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $9,278 |
28 | Mark Anthony Schmidt | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $9,278 |
29 | Luella Grossman Est | Linton, ND 58552 | $8,836 |
30 | Dianne Alice Moch | Lincoln, ND 58504 | $7,505 |
31 | Alex Joseph Moch | Lincoln, ND 58504 | $7,505 |
32 | Todd Donavon Nieuwsma | Herreid, SD 57632 | $7,249 |
33 | Timothy Wayne Reamann | Braddock, ND 58524 | $6,614 |
34 | Aloys Meier | Strasburg, ND 58573 | $6,565 |
35 | Marlon Ohlhauser | Linton, ND 58552 | $6,502 |
36 | Rodney Michael Jacob | Kintyre, ND 58549 | $6,322 |
37 | Perry D Ryckman | Pollock, SD 57648 | $6,096 |
38 | James Vander Vorst | Hague, ND 58542 | $5,828 |
39 | Mark Baumiller | Hazelton, ND 58544 | $5,548 |
40 | Kenneth John Moser | Pollock, SD 57648 | $5,508 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”