Direct Payment Program in Foster County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 545
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Foster County, North Dakota totaled $30,670,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kevin Christopher Wolsky | Carrington, ND 58421 | $229,744 |
42 | James Edward Carr | Carrington, ND 58421 | $223,335 |
43 | Constance Faye Carr | Carrington, ND 58421 | $223,335 |
44 | Glenn Vincent Ableidinger | Kensal, ND 58455 | $221,384 |
45 | James Gregory Miller | Carrington, ND 58421 | $211,188 |
46 | Kyle Francis Frappier | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $210,683 |
47 | John Holth | Carrington, ND 58421 | $206,671 |
48 | Wayne L Anderson | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $205,527 |
49 | Mark Douglas Mullenberg | Harbinger, NC 27941 | $205,521 |
50 | Douglas Kim Skadberg | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $205,238 |
51 | Amber Waves Farm Inc | Kensal, ND 58455 | $204,663 |
52 | Dennis Lee Hagel | Carrington, ND 58421 | $203,293 |
53 | Lucas Paul Spitzer | Kensal, ND 58455 | $203,262 |
54 | Roger L Edland | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $196,372 |
55 | Ginger Rae Skadberg | Carrington, ND 58421 | $194,091 |
56 | Paul Dean Skadberg | Carrington, ND 58421 | $194,090 |
57 | Herman Richard Johnson | Glenfield, ND 58443 | $191,416 |
58 | Linda Lou Johnson | Glenfield, ND 58443 | $191,416 |
59 | James W Johnson | Kensal, ND 58455 | $190,327 |
60 | John Mitchell Lura | Carrington, ND 58421 | $186,048 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”