Total Conservation Programs in Foster County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 145
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Foster County, North Dakota totaled $464,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bradley Delfs | Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 | $3,208 |
42 | Linda Vig | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $3,132 |
43 | Jared Olson | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $3,132 |
44 | Wesley N Black | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,090 |
45 | Laurel Karen Hart | Carrington, ND 58421 | $2,988 |
46 | Bonnie M. Turner | Lynchburg, VA 24501 | $2,929 |
47 | Bernard And Arlene Kramer Land Trust | Fargo, ND 58103 | $2,886 |
48 | Thomas Gordon Miller | Minot, ND 58703 | $2,824 |
49 | Donald James Gussiaas | Carrington, ND 58421 | $2,741 |
50 | Kent Allen Gussiaas | Carrington, ND 58421 | $2,741 |
51 | Mark Glinz | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $2,571 |
52 | Jane Renee Nieland | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $2,549 |
53 | Mark K Knudtson | Deadwood, SD 57732 | $2,546 |
54 | Tom Seitz | Alpharetta, GA 30004 | $2,530 |
55 | Gussiaas Family Farm Inc | Carrington, ND 58421 | $2,506 |
56 | Elliot John Paczkowski | Kensal, ND 58455 | $2,398 |
57 | Lee Wahlund | Carrington, ND 58421 | $2,382 |
58 | Edward Anderson | Carrington, ND 58421 | $2,139 |
59 | Jared Zink Real Estate Limited Partnership | Carrington, ND 58421 | $2,088 |
60 | Daniel Nolan Scanson | Grace City, ND 58445 | $2,039 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”