Total Disaster Programs in Foster County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 221
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Foster County, North Dakota totaled $5,223,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Travis L Aljets | Carrington, ND 58421 | $11,785 |
122 | Ka Farming Llp | Elk River, MN 55330 | $11,418 |
123 | Roy Paul Brandt | Glenfield, ND 58443 | $11,112 |
124 | Jeffery Wede | Carrington, ND 58421 | $10,883 |
125 | Gary Anderson | Carrington, ND 58421 | $10,680 |
126 | James Dale Holth | Carrington, ND 58421 | $10,478 |
127 | Curtiss Craig Klein | Carrington, ND 58421 | $10,440 |
128 | Frankie Vlach | Glenfield, ND 58443 | $10,392 |
129 | Chad Van Dyke | Glenfield, ND 58443 | $10,302 |
130 | Stephanie Vande Hoven | Carrington, ND 58421 | $10,246 |
131 | Gavin Chester Black | Grace City, ND 58445 | $10,140 |
132 | Matthew John Bear | Glenfield, ND 58443 | $10,053 |
133 | Thomas Gauderman | Mayville, ND 58257 | $10,048 |
134 | Charles Luverne Linderman | Carrington, ND 58421 | $9,994 |
135 | Carl Stangeland | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $9,461 |
136 | Paul Spitzer | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $9,230 |
137 | Peggy A Spitzer | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $9,230 |
138 | Michael Andrew Gussiaas | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $9,109 |
139 | Stacey Lea Gussiaas | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $9,109 |
140 | Ethan Stangeland | Glenfield, ND 58443 | $8,718 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”