Conservation Reserve Program in Foster County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 565
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Foster County, North Dakota totaled $23,444,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | August Walen | Hill City, MN 55748 | $220,354 |
22 | Dennis Lee Hagel | Carrington, ND 58421 | $216,334 |
23 | Frankie Vlach | Glenfield, ND 58443 | $204,584 |
24 | David Vining | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $202,389 |
25 | Mineard Stolz | Milton Freewater, OR 97862 | $201,110 |
26 | Rindy Bros | Carrington, ND 58421 | $200,017 |
27 | Constance Faye Carr | Carrington, ND 58421 | $193,182 |
28 | Merle Bickett Jr | Carrington, ND 58421 | $184,059 |
29 | Dewayne Leppke | Portage, MI 49024 | $182,331 |
30 | Alan Paul Scanson | Glenfield, ND 58443 | $176,784 |
31 | Betty Lou Schroeder | Carrington, ND 58421 | $170,439 |
32 | William Walter Trecker Jr | Carrington, ND 58421 | $168,200 |
33 | Kathy Jo Geier | Carrington, ND 58421 | $166,229 |
34 | Elaine Emma Gussiaas | Carrington, ND 58421 | $162,996 |
35 | Fred Dreher | Papillion, NE 68046 | $161,860 |
36 | George Lawrence Aljets Jr | Carrington, ND 58421 | $156,806 |
37 | Bernard Eidsvoog | Carrington, ND 58421 | $151,711 |
38 | Robert Pat Nihill | Kensal, ND 58455 | $149,113 |
39 | Thomas Thurlow | Carrington, ND 58421 | $147,726 |
40 | Daniel James Simenson | Glenfield, ND 58443 | $147,718 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”