Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Golden Valley County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 82
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Golden Valley County, North Dakota totaled $1,158,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alexander John Maus | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $8,736 |
42 | Lance A Ambo | Beach, ND 58621 | $8,634 |
43 | Benjamin J Martin | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $7,845 |
44 | , | $7,691 | |
45 | Mark Andrew Begger | Beach, ND 58621 | $7,580 |
46 | Casey Wersland | Beach, ND 58621 | $7,556 |
47 | Talon Nielsen | Beach, ND 58621 | $7,404 |
48 | Wirtzfeld Brothers | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $6,923 |
49 | Nathan James Maus | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $6,920 |
50 | Brian Fischer | Golva, ND 58632 | $6,813 |
51 | Max Schmeling Jr | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $6,708 |
52 | Justin James Maus | Golva, ND 58632 | $5,958 |
53 | Rusty Makelky | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $5,760 |
54 | David Bares | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $5,638 |
55 | Tyler Maus | Golva, ND 58632 | $5,536 |
56 | Alan James Martin | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $5,403 |
57 | Todd Stedman | Beach, ND 58621 | $5,400 |
58 | Brian Dean Sarsland | Beach, ND 58621 | $5,285 |
59 | Nathan Woodrow Nelson | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $4,713 |
60 | Clark Beach | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $4,594 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”