Farm Subsidy information
Golden Valley County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Golden Valley County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 272
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Golden Valley County, North Dakota totaled $19,841,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Douglas A Davidson | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $103,423 |
42 | David Bares | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $100,166 |
43 | Raymond Donald Tescher | Beach, ND 58621 | $97,572 |
44 | William Orion Lowman | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $97,461 |
45 | Brian Fischer | Golva, ND 58632 | $97,103 |
46 | Andrew P Moe | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $96,076 |
47 | Gordon J Ueckert | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $95,846 |
48 | Paul Daniel Schmeling | Golva, ND 58632 | $91,689 |
49 | David C Davidson | Beach, ND 58621 | $91,168 |
50 | Mark Andrew Begger | Beach, ND 58621 | $90,774 |
51 | Lance Dykins | Beach, ND 58621 | $90,004 |
52 | Cecilia Stedman | Beach, ND 58621 | $89,290 |
53 | Destry Lee Northrop | Golva, ND 58632 | $88,845 |
54 | John R Fischer | Golva, ND 58632 | $88,079 |
55 | Michael Vanhorn | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $85,883 |
56 | Robert Mark Makelky | Beach, ND 58621 | $85,114 |
57 | Seth Jay Barkley | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $84,389 |
58 | Kenny R Stedman | Beach, ND 58621 | $83,789 |
59 | Gary Gregory Maus | Golva, ND 58632 | $81,505 |
60 | Jaden William Adams | Belfield, ND 58622 | $78,829 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”