Farm Subsidy information
Golden Valley County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Golden Valley County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 272
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Golden Valley County, North Dakota totaled $19,841,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Richard Eugene Goodijohn | Beach, ND 58621 | $78,108 |
62 | Lusk L Lowman | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $76,626 |
63 | Riverside Ranching Llp | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $73,142 |
64 | Troy James Tescher | Beach, ND 58621 | $69,321 |
65 | Dan Schaal | Beach, ND 58621 | $69,013 |
66 | Scott Rojic | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $68,120 |
67 | Robert Kremers | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $67,296 |
68 | Dale Gasho | Beach, ND 58621 | $65,922 |
69 | Clarence R Finneman | Beach, ND 58621 | $64,969 |
70 | Gary Hardy | Beach, ND 58621 | $63,826 |
71 | Nolan Ryan Zook | Beach, ND 58621 | $61,642 |
72 | Darin James Schumacher | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $59,331 |
73 | Loren Dale Szudera | Beach, ND 58621 | $56,895 |
74 | Casey Wersland | Beach, ND 58621 | $56,725 |
75 | Todd Stedman | Beach, ND 58621 | $54,945 |
76 | Seth Tanner Tescher | Beach, ND 58621 | $52,602 |
77 | Douglas J Tescher | Medora, ND 58645 | $52,042 |
78 | Gerald Streitz | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $50,027 |
79 | Cody Ueckert | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $49,324 |
80 | Douglas J Johnson | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $48,738 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”