Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Golden Valley County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 135
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Golden Valley County, North Dakota totaled $703,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dale Edward Maus | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,908 |
62 | Beau Thomas Franzen | Sidney, MT 59270 | $2,834 |
63 | Terrance D Stedman | Beach, ND 58621 | $2,813 |
64 | Gordon J Ueckert | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,810 |
65 | Rusty Makelky | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,725 |
66 | Dale Gasho | Beach, ND 58621 | $2,630 |
67 | Benjamin J Martin | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $2,616 |
68 | Wirtzfeld Brothers | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,586 |
69 | , | $2,536 | |
70 | Max Schmeling Jr | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,510 |
71 | Miles Gene Gerbig | Amidon, ND 58620 | $2,301 |
72 | Bryce Schafer | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,230 |
73 | David Bares | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,223 |
74 | David Michael Clarin | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,184 |
75 | Alan James Martin | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $2,139 |
76 | Justin James Maus | Golva, ND 58632 | $2,135 |
77 | Clinton Gorrell | Beach, ND 58621 | $2,103 |
78 | Alexander John Maus | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,084 |
79 | John Abraham | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,084 |
80 | Tyler Maus | Golva, ND 58632 | $2,031 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”