Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Golden Valley County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 232
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Golden Valley County, North Dakota totaled $8,139,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Michael Vanhorn | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $22,697 |
82 | Sharptail Ranch Llp | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $22,583 |
83 | Mark Andrew Begger | Beach, ND 58621 | $21,816 |
84 | Richard Michael Knopp Jr | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $21,627 |
85 | Walter Rojic | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $20,591 |
86 | Szudera Farms Inc | Beach, ND 58621 | $19,222 |
87 | Todd Stedman | Beach, ND 58621 | $18,736 |
88 | Monte Beach | Wibaux, MT 59353 | $18,519 |
89 | James William Adams | Medora, ND 58645 | $18,079 |
90 | Ronald D Davidson | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $16,686 |
91 | Raymond Donald Tescher | Beach, ND 58621 | $16,670 |
92 | Lance Dykins | Beach, ND 58621 | $16,521 |
93 | Peter James Schmeling | Golva, ND 58632 | $16,218 |
94 | Robert Kremers | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $15,093 |
95 | Harmon H Olstad | Beach, ND 58621 | $14,312 |
96 | David Anthony Scherman | Baker, MT 59313 | $13,878 |
97 | Douglas J Johnson | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $13,588 |
98 | Cassandra Ann Szudera | Beach, ND 58621 | $13,412 |
99 | William Robert Szudera | Beach, ND 58621 | $13,412 |
100 | H Howard Olstad | Beach, ND 58621 | $13,346 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”