Farm Subsidy information
Golden Valley County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Golden Valley County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,004
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Golden Valley County, North Dakota totaled $164,538,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Keith Eugene Farstveet | Beach, ND 58621 | $475,992 |
62 | Loren Dale Szudera | Beach, ND 58621 | $472,636 |
63 | George D Hildebrant | Beach, ND 58621 | $462,384 |
64 | Allen Gasho | Beach, ND 58621 | $454,034 |
65 | Raymond Donald Tescher | Beach, ND 58621 | $452,470 |
66 | Michael Vanhorn | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $447,708 |
67 | Richard Kukowski | Beach, ND 58621 | $443,627 |
68 | John Abraham | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $443,598 |
69 | James M Schillo | Golva, ND 58632 | $440,574 |
70 | Harry P Hayden | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $438,736 |
71 | Daniel Maus Estate | Golva, ND 58632 | $436,466 |
72 | Edmund Kukowski Estate | Apple Valley, MN 55124 | $433,613 |
73 | Joseph Donald Fritz | Beach, ND 58621 | $433,173 |
74 | Travis John Hauck | Beach, ND 58621 | $428,832 |
75 | Sharptail Ranch Llp | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $427,542 |
76 | Paul Daniel Schmeling | Golva, ND 58632 | $423,879 |
77 | Maria Louise Ross | Beach, ND 58621 | $421,803 |
78 | Cecilia Stedman | Beach, ND 58621 | $420,036 |
79 | Richard Michael Miske | Wibaux, MT 59353 | $419,270 |
80 | Andrew Henry Smith | Beach, ND 58621 | $400,194 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”