Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Golden Valley County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 135
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Golden Valley County, North Dakota totaled $703,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Weinreis Brothers | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $76,040 |
2 | Ronald James Volk | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $33,703 |
3 | Joseph Donald Fritz | Beach, ND 58621 | $20,967 |
4 | Jaden William Adams | Belfield, ND 58622 | $18,558 |
5 | Jeff Schieffer | Beach, ND 58621 | $18,541 |
6 | Mark Andrew Begger | Beach, ND 58621 | $17,374 |
7 | Dietz Family Angus Llp | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $16,733 |
8 | Donald Maus | Golva, ND 58632 | $15,988 |
9 | Troy James Tescher | Beach, ND 58621 | $15,219 |
10 | Mark Benjamin Lund | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $14,678 |
11 | , | $14,614 | |
12 | Darin James Schumacher | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $14,384 |
13 | Destry Lee Northrop | Golva, ND 58632 | $14,189 |
14 | Wcg, LLC | Golva, ND 58632 | $13,093 |
15 | Raymond Donald Tescher | Beach, ND 58621 | $12,635 |
16 | Lusk L Lowman | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $12,442 |
17 | Andrew P Moe | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $12,351 |
18 | Robert Mark Makelky | Beach, ND 58621 | $12,156 |
19 | Robert Kyle Sperry | Trotters, ND 58621 | $12,108 |
20 | Michael Vanhorn | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $11,696 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>